Accident of Asiana Flight 214 Findings, Possible Causes - 825 Words

The Accident of Asiana Flight 214: History, Findings, Possible Causes (Coursework Sample) Content: Asiana Flight 214Studentà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s NameInstitution AffiliationDateAsiana Flight 214Introduction/ HistoryThree years back (in 2013) on a Sunday, Asiana Airlines Flight 214 slammed while arriving at San Francisco's air terminal, killing three travelers and harming 187 more. Survivors recall the occurrence, in which the plane cut a seawall barely a short distance from the runway. Apparently, it spun roughly for 330 degrees, broke into pieces and burst into flames. Everything happened on a crisp morning. The Boeing 777 originating from Seoul, South Korea, smashed on arriving on Saturday, July 6. Three travelers, all young ladies, succumbed as an aftereffect of the remarkable U.S. air crash in four years (Martinez, 2014). Reports have it that a Pilot's blunder was contributing element in the accident. Notably, the accident denoted the first occasion when that the new Boeing 777, a standout amongst the most advanced air crafts, was included in a lethal accident.FindingsTh e government safety investigative board affirmed that the pilots flying the Asiana Airlines fumbled their arrival approach and incidentally closed off a programmed speed control framework that could have prevented the tragedy ("Asiana Airlines crash caused by pilot error and confusion, investigators say,à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ 2014).The National Transportation Safety Board additionally faulted the accident for the pilots' inability to screen their velocity and elevation and a choice to end prematurely, the finding that came past the point of no return. The pilots permitted the plane's velocity to moderate beneath appropriate speed making it lose elevation too rapidly. Seven seconds before effect a voice was heard on the cockpit voice recorder talking of speed increment. The help first officer possessed the cockpit hop seat told NTSB agents that he was cautioning them that their velocity was too moderate as they drew closer to the runway. That was a few seconds before effect the slowdown noti ce stick shaker shook into perceptible activity. After a short moment before the impact, the pilots endeavored to start a go-around. By then the plane was descending excessively near the ground to recuperate.Possible CausesAgents who examined the accident affirmed that the pilots were not quick enough and came too low to touch down securely. Notwithstanding the primary reasons, the NTSB presumed that various elements added to the accident, including the intricacy of the Boeing's computerized flight frameworks and fatigue that reasonably affected the performance of the pilots (Weikel, 2014). It is believed that the instructor chief at the controls that day did not have the preparation for finding a flying machine physically, and the pilot monitor checking in the cockpit failed to provide sufficient supervision.There is an assortment of possible contributing elements, including the expertise and preparing of Asiana's pilots and the impact of electronic flight frameworks on the flight crew awareness. Specialists found that the pilots incidentally deactivated the gadget when they failed to completely switch off the plane's computerized flight frameworks amid the approach to landing. Thus, the programmed throttle went into a hold mode, and its activation failed when the velocity dropped.Apparently, the pilot was under training and had never handled a Boeing 777 plane before. As such, Flight 214 was the mentor pilot's first flight as an educator and he had never overseen a learner amid a plane landing (Weikel, 2014). Consequently, investigations were conducted to affirm whether the preparation exercise diverted the pilots from performing their obligations. Since the accident, Asiana has effectively declared that they will improve the preparation program for pilots hoping to fly new airplanes. The new measures will incorporate advancing training for a visual approach and computerized flight. The vow to further direct flight examination at airplane terminals that are vulnerable from a safety perspective.Similarly, language barrier is suspected to have added to the mishap. Case in point, the pilots are said to have talked both English and Korean in the cockpit. It is believed that communication by the air traffic controller was communicated in English, and the Korean correspondence that was recorded would have been between the Korean pilots ("Possible Causes of the Asiana Flight 214 Crash," n.d.). Furthermore, there was no information if the post-crash interviews of the pilots were led in English, Korean or with the guide of a translator. It would be a pie...