Post Freudian theorists and their theories Essay

As indicated earlier, key personality emergenceal theories that were developed after Freuds psychoanalytical theory were either directly derived of it or aimed at criticizing some of its major comp integritynts. a) Erik Erickson i) Stages of development Barbara (2008) and Lieberman (2007) check over that the get to of Eric Erickson was a direct derivative of Freudian considerations in human development. Eric Erickson theory of psychosocial development concurred with Freudian view that life, development and challenges develop in stages.Psychosocial theory further builds the touch of the ego which was for the most part brought come out of the closet by Freud as external reality inculcation to ones mind. Particularly, the stages of Erickson psychosocial development powerfully cohere with Sigmunds work. Clara et al (2008) explain that stage one of Ericksons theory of psychosocial development is reflected through verify versus mistrust largely because the child is entirely depend ent on the caregivers. want Freud mentioned the pleasure a child derives from oral stimulation, Erickson emphasized on the resulting affair as a platform in propelling the child to the beside stages. Therefore, Ericksons first stage borrows the concept of external environment in creating enough force for the next stage. In the second stage of psychosocial development, Erickson as borrows from Freuds anal stage which is a critical training factor. Nelson-Jones (2005) explains that from a higher consideration, Erickson argued that learning to go to the toilet gave a strong good sense of control and therefore great independence.As Freud clearly brought out the nonion of the ego, Ericksons third stage of initiative versus guilt emphasizes the assertion of part and control which plays an important role in the later stages development. Erickson indicated that many children seek to assert their superiority among others barely with careful considerations of the existing repercussion s (Marrie and Janneke-van, 2007). Notably, Erickson agrees with Freud that parents and caretakers must mistreat in to facilitate the needed reassurance and therefore avoid guilt to their boylike ones.It is however worth noting that Erickson strongly differed with Freud on how long development persists in an individual(a)s life. While Freud postulated that personality development only lasted to the venereal stage when an individual starts getting interested in sexual relationship with those of the opposite sex, Erickson postulated that developed progressed to the old age (Busch, 2009). However, scholars pop to be strongly divided with one group considering the latter Ericksons work to be based on criticism of the Freuds work and therefore its development (Barbara, 2008).ii) The notion of fixation One resilient notion of Freuds work is the notion of succession between different stages. Though they do not necessary cohere on time and expected repercussions, both theorists agree that people at different stages must go through them successfully or get fixated (Hayes, 2004). Fixation as Henry (2009) point out denotes the inability to progress since latter stages are entirely dependent on the previous stages success. Erickson argued that all stages present an individual with two negating outcomes positive and negative.For type between year five to eleven, Erickson indicated that a successful individual ordain become industrious while the unsuccessful ones will suffer lower rank (Laura and Pam, 2007). b) Lacanian theory In his work, largely referred to as the return of Freud, Emile Lacans concepts appear to be fully defined by the former (Adam, 2008). Though Lacan strongly criticized the Freuds separation of the conscious (ego) and unconscious (id), he largely utilise the same concepts in his work.Lacan argued that the conscious and unconscious considerations of the mind were not different, but operated from a highly sophisticated and complex outline compar ed to Freuds consideration. Locan reverberate as Brickman (2009) and Gottdiener (2008) conclusions suggest is formative and a derivative of the experience an individual gets during development. Therefore, the paradigm of the imagery to be effective during the younger years as opposed to the old age which is more subjective fits the Freudian intension of development persisting only to the genital stage.