In what ways was Napoleon a warrior overloard in his Treatment of his subjects? :: European Europe History

In what ways was Napoleon a warrior overloard in his discussion of his subjects?The question asks what was Napoleons treatment of his European subjects. However first we need to ascertain what these subjects were and distinguish the differences between them. The states of the Grand Empire fell into one of two categories - refines annexed directly to France, or satallite states under French control but allegedly enjoying a modicum of independence. The extent of Napoleons influence varied, depending on the length of time a particular country remained under his authority. Examples of annexed territories are Nice,Savoy, Belguim and the Germanlands west of the Rhine. These were annexed early (pre 1800) and had were quickly incorporated into the French administrative system, however these states were mainly divided into divisions for enlisting purposes. By the time of the Brumaire fuedalism as in France had been abolished in these territories. Also land belonging to the nobility or ch urch were either confiscated or sold. only the annexed states were ruled from Paris and were regarded as extensions of the old France. All new French policies were introduced manage the civil code and the judicial process of civil and ccriminal courts. A fishing gear circle of nominally independent satellite states, were mainly run by Napoleons relatives, formed a buffer zone around France. These states protected the boarders of the French empire from any(prenominal) attack. Some examples of satellite states are Switzerland, Spain, Naples and Italy. These satellite states, allegedly independent, infact had little frredom of action. Their rulers were strictley supervise and tutored by Napoleon in the way they should go. The satellite states was very different. They were neer allowed to forget that they existed only to serve the intrests of France. Napoleonwanted them to fullfill a number of other priceless functions in Napoleons imperial enterprise. They were first and foremos t military vassal states and Napoleons kinship with themwas eventually wery like that of a warrior-overlord, extracting the advantage from them for the minimum return. These states raised somewhat a third of the troops for the Grand Armee. The distribution of crowns among Napoleons relatives served two purposes for him. iodine of the two was that they would remain loyal to him no matter what. Also, with such a large number of Bonaparte sovereigns available he could expect in due course to arrange useful marriage alliances with older royal houses and give his successors the dynastic respectability the family presently lacked.